24 players, a squad of 3 4 man Rainbow fireteams vs 12 terrorists. but going in the opposite direction, 64 players on huge maps, would be a bigger shift from the counter-terrrorism unit that Rainbow operate as. I feel I should preface this with my opinion I don't enjoy Siege. There should be tension, it's a key part of the series. 64 players would mean endless gunfire and running into players when you turn every corner, which goes against everything Rainbow Six should be. Slow paced, holding down spots (camping), moving through the levels tactically with communication and coordination with your team mates, etc. 24 players at most might work, but the reason it suits 16 players is because it's a tactical game. Imagine Calypso Casino or Trainyard with 64 players.Įither Vegas game with 64 players would be an absolute disaster. It has everything a game should have but more. This is specifically about why RSV2 should become remastered instead. Ppl dont care about working together, theyre obsessed with the moba concept.īut this isnt a rs siege topic. Camping methods are suggested by the company. No communication/teamwork/strategy whatsoever. (My stats measured after playing for two weeks). about only 5% of players in a match use mics, the rest dont. nonstop accidental teamkilling because of the mandatory hardcore mode
Siege games end quickly coz of the various reasons: RS has a shooter element and a stealth element like in Splinter Cell. I don't care for the PvP side of it, and have a group of friends to do the terrorist missions with, and they are absolutely amazing. You should probably look at less biased source.
0 kommentar(er)
